<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Backup Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/</link>
	<description>Linux Guides &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hacer copias de seguridad automáticas y periódicas en Ubuntu: Back in Time &#171; Doculinux</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Hacer copias de seguridad automáticas y periódicas en Ubuntu: Back in Time &#171; Doculinux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] Otras soluciones de backup para Ubuntu, en Tuxguides.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Otras soluciones de backup para Ubuntu, en Tuxguides.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will I ditch Windows 7 for Linux&#8230;???</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Will I ditch Windows 7 for Linux&#8230;???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] backups and their size. I found a good post with comments that mentioned several options. Click here to check it out. Back In Time or Areca Backup seem to be the favorites and I think I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] backups and their size. I found a good post with comments that mentioned several options. Click here to check it out. Back In Time or Areca Backup seem to be the favorites and I think I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu 10.10 Needs A Simple, Reliable, Integrated Backup Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu 10.10 Needs A Simple, Reliable, Integrated Backup Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] number of GUI-based and CL-based tools exist, so this type of backup software is the most likely to end up in a default [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number of GUI-based and CL-based tools exist, so this type of backup software is the most likely to end up in a default [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-118</guid>
		<description>@Alain
&quot;As most of us have external devices attached to our systems with Hard Disks ranging from a ’small’ 250Gb to 1.5 or 2TB there is no limit to the amount of data that you can safeguard without resorting to ‘backup software’&quot;

Just copying the complete backup set of data over every so often misses one of the most important aspects of most backup software - incrementalism. That means you backup all the data in full once and then further backups (all copied to your USB stick, drive or wherever) are just the changes from that original. The advantage of  this is that you then have a history, so if you discover that one of your files is corrupt for example you can go back several days/weeks/months/whatever to whenever it wasn&#039;t. 

With the straight-copy system you&#039;re suggesting it&#039;s a lottery that the file you want to restore wasn&#039;t also corrupted/deleted/whatever in the backup you made a few days ago.  Or in other words it&#039;s only one step up from the people who think that RAID is a backup solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alain<br />
&#8220;As most of us have external devices attached to our systems with Hard Disks ranging from a ’small’ 250Gb to 1.5 or 2TB there is no limit to the amount of data that you can safeguard without resorting to ‘backup software’&#8221;</p>
<p>Just copying the complete backup set of data over every so often misses one of the most important aspects of most backup software &#8211; incrementalism. That means you backup all the data in full once and then further backups (all copied to your USB stick, drive or wherever) are just the changes from that original. The advantage of  this is that you then have a history, so if you discover that one of your files is corrupt for example you can go back several days/weeks/months/whatever to whenever it wasn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>With the straight-copy system you&#8217;re suggesting it&#8217;s a lottery that the file you want to restore wasn&#8217;t also corrupted/deleted/whatever in the backup you made a few days ago.  Or in other words it&#8217;s only one step up from the people who think that RAID is a backup solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-27</guid>
		<description>No mention of Amazon ? There are some great utilities like s3cmd and there are lots of howtos to setup cron tasks to automate backup. It&#039;s very cheap even for a lot of storage and the 2GB Dropbox free limit is too low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of Amazon ? There are some great utilities like s3cmd and there are lots of howtos to setup cron tasks to automate backup. It&#8217;s very cheap even for a lot of storage and the 2GB Dropbox free limit is too low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Alain, I agree that some backup solutions are overkill for home users.  That is why I presented other options such as dropbox and spideroak.  These allow you to backup your files to a remote location for free without needing to run a server.  If you want a more complete backup solution, there are other options that you can backup your whole drive with.

Also, backup software such as unison is a gui front for command line tools such as cp and rsync.  Some people are not comfortable using the command line, so something like Unison is perfect for them.

Tim, I agree with creating a separate directory for home.  I have recently started doing that when I install ubuntu, and it makes reinstalling a lot easier knowing that all of my settings will be retained.  I agree that this should probably be done by default.  The only issue I could foresee would be how to decide how big to make this directory (you would need to either provide a recommendation to the user based upon the free space, or have a default setting), but this would not be very difficult to fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alain, I agree that some backup solutions are overkill for home users.  That is why I presented other options such as dropbox and spideroak.  These allow you to backup your files to a remote location for free without needing to run a server.  If you want a more complete backup solution, there are other options that you can backup your whole drive with.</p>
<p>Also, backup software such as unison is a gui front for command line tools such as cp and rsync.  Some people are not comfortable using the command line, so something like Unison is perfect for them.</p>
<p>Tim, I agree with creating a separate directory for home.  I have recently started doing that when I install ubuntu, and it makes reinstalling a lot easier knowing that all of my settings will be retained.  I agree that this should probably be done by default.  The only issue I could foresee would be how to decide how big to make this directory (you would need to either provide a recommendation to the user based upon the free space, or have a default setting), but this would not be very difficult to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane Gaudreault</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane Gaudreault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Alain, your observations and points are spot on! I periodically copy my entire /home directory to a separate drive for safekeeping. Data resides in places other than dedicated directories (eg. Documents, Photos, etc.) and I want to preserve all of my data and settings.

I use the following command at the command line (where the actual date is substituted in place of ):
cp /home/tim/ -a --target-directory=/media/pip/Backup//

One default thing I would like to see distros do is creating a separate partition for /home during installation. This helps by separating a user&#039;s data from the installation of the underlying OS and makes it much easier to preserve the user&#039;s data if the user decides to reinstall or switch distros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alain, your observations and points are spot on! I periodically copy my entire /home directory to a separate drive for safekeeping. Data resides in places other than dedicated directories (eg. Documents, Photos, etc.) and I want to preserve all of my data and settings.</p>
<p>I use the following command at the command line (where the actual date is substituted in place of ):<br />
cp /home/tim/ -a &#8211;target-directory=/media/pip/Backup//</p>
<p>One default thing I would like to see distros do is creating a separate partition for /home during installation. This helps by separating a user&#8217;s data from the installation of the underlying OS and makes it much easier to preserve the user&#8217;s data if the user decides to reinstall or switch distros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-23</guid>
		<description>The term &#039;backup&#039; is not explained in your topic. Do you mean a simple &#039;copy&#039; or do you mean a &#039;copy + user rights&#039;, because in the latter case, how does the interchange with MS-Windows and other OS work.
As most backup softwares write out the data in a customized format, retrieving them - bypassing the tool and version that created them - is almost impossible.

Moreover, I find backup solutions for a home user - who doesn&#039;t have a server running 24/7 in his attic - overkill.
Attach a 32 of 64 Gb thumbstick, format it to the FS of your liking and copy the files over. or burn it on a DL DVD and you have 9GB+ of data available. As most of us have external devices attached to our systems with Hard Disks ranging from a &#039;small&#039; 250Gb to 1.5 or 2TB there is no limit to the amount of data that you can safeguard without resorting to &#039;backup software&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8216;backup&#8217; is not explained in your topic. Do you mean a simple &#8216;copy&#8217; or do you mean a &#8216;copy + user rights&#8217;, because in the latter case, how does the interchange with MS-Windows and other OS work.<br />
As most backup softwares write out the data in a customized format, retrieving them &#8211; bypassing the tool and version that created them &#8211; is almost impossible.</p>
<p>Moreover, I find backup solutions for a home user &#8211; who doesn&#8217;t have a server running 24/7 in his attic &#8211; overkill.<br />
Attach a 32 of 64 Gb thumbstick, format it to the FS of your liking and copy the files over. or burn it on a DL DVD and you have 9GB+ of data available. As most of us have external devices attached to our systems with Hard Disks ranging from a &#8216;small&#8217; 250Gb to 1.5 or 2TB there is no limit to the amount of data that you can safeguard without resorting to &#8216;backup software&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dajomu</title>
		<link>http://www.tuxguides.com/ubuntu-backup-software/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>dajomu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epicconstructions.com/?p=73#comment-22</guid>
		<description>what about flyback? http://code.google.com/p/flyback/
Or timevault? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeVault</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about flyback? <a href="http://code.google.com/p/flyback/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/flyback/</a><br />
Or timevault? <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeVault" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeVault</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

